<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>IMPACTS OF PROCESSING PARAMETERS ON THE QUALITY ATTRIBUTES  AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF RICE (Oryza sativa LINNAEUS)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1326" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1326</id>
<updated>2026-04-09T03:40:33Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-09T03:40:33Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>IMPACTS OF PROCESSING PARAMETERS ON THE QUALITY ATTRIBUTES  AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF RICE (Oryza sativa LINNAEUS)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1327" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>SANUSI, MAYOWA SAHEED</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1327</id>
<updated>2022-02-18T13:49:02Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">IMPACTS OF PROCESSING PARAMETERS ON THE QUALITY ATTRIBUTES  AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF RICE (Oryza sativa LINNAEUS)
SANUSI, MAYOWA SAHEED
Information on food properties and energy requirements for processing is a &#13;
prerequisite in plant design. Inconsistent quality attributes of rice varieties and energy &#13;
profile of the unit operations hinder acceptability. However, literature is sparse on &#13;
impacts of processing parameters on quality attributes and energy consumption in rice &#13;
processing. This study was designed, therefore, to investigate and model the impacts of &#13;
processing parameters on the quality attributes of five locally grown rice varieties and &#13;
the associated energy consumption. &#13;
Optimum rice processing conditions [soaking temperature (65-75°C), soaking time &#13;
(10-16 h), steaming time (20-30 min) and paddy moisture content (12-16%)] were &#13;
obtained using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Paddies of NERICA 8, FARO &#13;
52, FARO 61, FARO 61 and FARO 44 varieties were processed to white and parboiled &#13;
rice using standard procedures. The milling recovery, head milled rice, chalkiness, &#13;
brown rice recovery, head brown rice, colour, lightness, cooking time and water uptake &#13;
ratio of each variety were determined using IRRI standard methods. Energy &#13;
consumptions in the cleaning, soaking, steaming, drying, dehusking, polishing and &#13;
grading operations were estimated by fitting data on labour, fuel and electricity &#13;
consumption, time and machine efficiency into standard equations to determine total &#13;
energy consumption. The quality attributes and energy consumptions were separately &#13;
modelled using Taguchi, RSM and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) techniques for &#13;
each rice variety. Accuracy of models was determined using coefficient of &#13;
determination (R2&#13;
) and Mean Square Error (MSE). Multi-objectives function optimizer&#13;
was used to optimize desirable quality attributes and energy consumptions. Data were &#13;
analyzed using ANOVA at α0.05.&#13;
Milling recovery, head milled rice and chalkiness for white rice were 65.3-68.3%; &#13;
12.7-48.1% and 65.2-83.0% respectively. The corresponding results for parboiled rice &#13;
were 56.5-73.5%; 48.5-72.7% and 0.3-19.2% respectively. Brown rice recovery, head &#13;
brown rice, colour, lightness, cooking time and water uptake ratio were 75.9-82.7%; &#13;
74.6-82.2%; 14.1-32.0; 22.9-46.8, 10.0-51.6 min and 2.2-4.9 for parboiled rice. FARO &#13;
52 had the best quality attributes. The highest energy consuming operations in white &#13;
and parboiled rice processing were polishing (1.2 MJ) and drying (24.1 MJ). Quality &#13;
attributes of the rice varieties varied significantly with processing parameters. Total &#13;
energy consumption among the rice varieties varied significantly, ranging from 2.3 to &#13;
iii&#13;
2.3 MJ for white rice, and 45.3 to 76.9 MJ for parboiled rice. The ANN models were &#13;
more accurate for quality attributes [R2&#13;
(0.70–0.99); MSE (0.00-10.87)] than Taguchi &#13;
[R2&#13;
(0.15-0.85); MSE (0.04-15.58)], and RSM [R2&#13;
(0.22-0.99); MSE (0.01-20.19)]. &#13;
Taguchi models were more accurate for energy consumption [R2&#13;
(0.95-0.97); MSE &#13;
(1.24-1.96)], than RSM [R2&#13;
(0.90-0.92); MSE (4.31-4.72)], and ANN [R2&#13;
(0.93-0.94); &#13;
MSE (3.21-3.52)]. Optimum conditions required for processing the five rice varieties &#13;
varied significantly. Soaking temperature of 79ºC, 14 h soaking time, 23 min steaming &#13;
time and 16% paddy moisture content were the optimum conditions for processing &#13;
FARO 52. &#13;
The optimum conditions for achieving acceptable quality and minimal energy &#13;
consumption in the processing of five local rice varieties were established. Artificial &#13;
neural network performed best for modelling quality attributes of the rice varieties, &#13;
while Taguchi was the most precise for modelling energy consumption
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
