<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>WEED MANAGEMENT IN CASSAVA (Manihot esculenta Crantz) WITH SELECTED PRE- AND POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES UNDER ALTERNATIVE APPLICATION SEQUENCE</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1808" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1808</id>
<updated>2026-04-05T14:58:40Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-05T14:58:40Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>WEED MANAGEMENT IN CASSAVA (Manihot esculenta Crantz) WITH SELECTED PRE- AND POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES UNDER ALTERNATIVE APPLICATION SEQUENCE</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1809" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>ALABI, Mariam Adenike</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1809</id>
<updated>2024-04-18T15:50:32Z</updated>
<published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">WEED MANAGEMENT IN CASSAVA (Manihot esculenta Crantz) WITH SELECTED PRE- AND POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES UNDER ALTERNATIVE APPLICATION SEQUENCE
ALABI, Mariam Adenike
Cassava is a major crop in Africa, but weed management at its early growth stage is a problem.&#13;
Pre-emergence Herbicides (PrH), often supplemented with Post-emergence Herbicides (PoH),&#13;
are used for Weed Management (WM) in cassava. Delayed application of PrH could necessitate&#13;
the use of PoH before PrH. There is a dearth of information on the effects of application of PoH&#13;
before PrH as a WM strategy in cassava. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate some&#13;
PrH and PoH and their alternative application sequences on WM, growth and yield of cassava.&#13;
Three PrH: sulfentrazone, flumiosaxin+pyroxasulfone and indaziflam+isoxaflutole at 0.6,&#13;
0.11+0.14 and 0.068+0.20 kg a.i./ha, respectively and three PoH: clethodim+lactofen (0.21+0.41&#13;
kg a.i./ha), trifloysulfuron-sodium (5.25 g a.i./ha) and carfentrazone-ethyl (5.84 g a.i./ha) were&#13;
evaluated in cassava (TMEB419) plots planted at 1x0.8 m2. The PrH were evaluated in plots laid&#13;
in a Randomised Complete Block Design (RCBD). Plots treated with atrazine+S-metolachlor&#13;
(0.73+1.30 kg a.i./ha) plus 2-Hoe-Weeding (ASm+2HW), weed-free and a weedy-check served&#13;
as controls. Cassava Plant Height (CPH)-cm, stand count and Weed Dry Weight (WDW)-g/m2&#13;
per plot were measured at eight Weeks After Planting (WAP). In another experiment, two spray&#13;
methods (banded and broadcast) of the PoH at two WAP were evaluated on sprouted cassava in&#13;
a split-plot design. Spray methods and PoH were the main and sub-plots, respectively. Crop injury&#13;
(%) and Weed Control Efficacy (WCE)-% were assessed. Thereafter, two sequences of&#13;
application of PrH and PoH (PrH-PoH and PoH-PrH) were evaluated using split-plot&#13;
arrangements in RCBD. The PrH or banded PoH were either the main or sub-plots in the&#13;
sequences. Data were collected on WCE and cassava Storage Root Yield-SRY (t/ha). All&#13;
experiments were replicated three times. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and&#13;
ANOVA at α0.05.&#13;
The CPH ranged from 38.0±1.2 (sulfentrazone) to 53.2±1.3 (weed-free). Stand count ranged from&#13;
10471.3±0.0 (indaziflam+isoxaflutole) to 11976.1±0.0 (weed-free). Significant reduction (%) in&#13;
WDW relative to the maximum from weedy-check (110 g/m2) was in the order: 76.4&#13;
(sulfentrazone) &lt;82.1 (flumioxazin+pyroxasulfone) &lt;87.3 (indaziflam+isoxaflutole) &lt;89.1&#13;
(ASm+2HW) &lt;91.8 (weed-free). Broadcast spray caused 55.19 ±10.7% crop injury which was&#13;
significantly higher than 7.4 ±7.0% in banding. Crop injury of 92.2±10.7% (carfentrazone-ethyl),&#13;
54.8±10.7% (trifloysulfuron-sodium) and 19.0±7.1% (clethodim+lactofen) due to broadcastspraying were significantly higher than 6.3±7.0%, 7.8±7.0% and 8.2±7.0%, respectively in bandspraying. The WCE at 79.0±0.6% (carfentrazone-ethyl) was significantly lower than 88.4±0.6%&#13;
(trifloysulfuron-sodium) and 97.0±0.6% (clethodim+lactofen). The WCE in PrH-PoH was&#13;
significantly higher than in PoH-PrH. The WCE involving PrH-PoH application was 38.0%&#13;
(sulfentrazone), 29.4% (flumioxazin+pyroxasulfone), 28.1% (carfentrazone-ethyl) and 22.3%&#13;
(trifloysulfuron-sodium) significantly higher than those of their PoH-PrH. However, those of&#13;
indaziflam+isoxaflutole (7.0%) and clethodim+lactofen (6.3%) were not significantly different.&#13;
The SRY of 14.0±1.9 (sulfentrazone) was significantly lower than 28.7±1.9&#13;
(flumioxazin+pyroxasulfone) and 31.5±2.0 (indaziflam+isoxaflutole) across the PoH, while&#13;
22.7±1.9 (carfentrazone-ethyl), 23.9±1.9 (trifloysulfuron-sodium) and 26.7±1.9&#13;
(clethodim+lactofen) across the PrH were comparable.&#13;
Indaziflam+isoxaflutole and flumiosaxin+pyroxasulfone, and banded spray of trifloysulfuronsodium and clethodim+lactofen enhanced cassava growth and weed control efficacy. Sequences&#13;
involving clethodim+lactofen before or after indaziflam+isoxaflutole improved weed control&#13;
efficacy and yield of cassava.
</summary>
<dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
