<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>HIERARCHICAL BAYESIAN ESTIMATION OF HETEROGENEOUS DYNAMIC PANEL DATA MODEL</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/981" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/981</id>
<updated>2026-04-04T18:37:29Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-04T18:37:29Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>HIERARCHICAL BAYESIAN ESTIMATION OF HETEROGENEOUS DYNAMIC PANEL DATA MODEL</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/982" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>AKINLADE, YemisiOmolara</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/982</id>
<updated>2022-02-11T12:12:05Z</updated>
<published>2019-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">HIERARCHICAL BAYESIAN ESTIMATION OF HETEROGENEOUS DYNAMIC PANEL DATA MODEL
AKINLADE, YemisiOmolara
The estimation of static panel data model assumes homoscedastic error terms that is often violated in most economic models and when this happens, the Dynamic Panel Data Model (DPDM) is specified. The DPDM presumes correlation between lagged dependent variable and individual (unit) specific effects, resulting to heterogeneity among the units. The parameters of DPDM are usually estimated using classical approach which has no control for heterogeneity of the error terms leading to non-consistent estimates of the parameters.  This study was aimed at deriving Hierarchical Bayesian Estimator (HBE) capable of handling Heterogeneous Dynamic Panel Data Model (HDPDM).&#13;
&#13;
The HDPDM,  , was generalised as   for  and where   indicates that the marginal effect of  on  varies across the units,  is  vector of dependent variable,  is  matrix of unit specific regressors,   is  vector of parameters, and   is   vector of error terms.  The HBE was derived in two stages. First Stage of Hierarchical (FSH) parameter priors were   and , where   and   are means,   is variance-covariance and   is degree of freedom with independent Normal-Gamma prior.  Second Stage of Hierarchical (SSH) parameter priors were   and , where &#13;
(  and ) are means and (  and ) are variance-covariance with independent Normal-Wishart prior.  To account for heterogeneity, the FSH was derived from SSH to produce consistent estimates.  Data were simulated using Markov chain Monte Carlo approach with     and   to obtain Posterior Estimates (PEs) at 10,000 iterations. Three experiments for the individual (N) and time (T) were considered:  (20, 50),  (50, 50) and  (100, 15).  The performance of the HBE was assessed using Numerical Standard Error (NSE).  Relatively Non-informative Prior (RNP) ( = 0.04, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01) and Informative Prior (IP) ( = 25, 30, 50, 70) were examined to check for the sensitivity of priors on the PEs.&#13;
&#13;
The derived HBE was   The PEs of SSH for     were 0.1009, 0.1326, 1.0808, 4.0607, NSE   were 0.0002, &#13;
0.0008, 0.0017, 0.0068 and was 0.0007 for    were 0.0154, 0.0061, 3.9674, 1.9943, NSE  were 0.0002, 0.0005, 0.0014, 0.0041 and  was 0.0001 for   and    were 0.1535, 0.1635, 2.0456, 2.8847, NSE  were 0.0001, 0.0004, 0.0006, 0.0006 and  was 0.0000 for .  The obtained   gave a constant error variance for all the parameters across the units. The  option produced the least NSE, hence outperformed the other two.  The PEs of FSH for ,   were  = 0.1425, 0.1443, 0.1501, 0.1275, 0.1333.  = 1.0172, 0.9123, 0.8553, 1.0172, 0.2225,   = 1.5539, 1.5911, 1.5761, 1.5539, 1.4245,  = 2.5193, 2.5345, 2.5005, 2.5193, 2.5231.  These reflected the marginal effects of  on   across the units. The RNP with values of   for   = 1.5400, 1.5404, 1.5413, 1.5431 and   = 2.5358, 2.5336, 2.5354, 2.5358, while for IP,  = 1.5418, 1.5399, 1.5427, 1.5420 and  = 2.6358, 2.6336, 2.6369, 2.6373. The estimated parameters with changes in   values were closely identical to the pre-set   and   values. Thus, indicating the sensitivity of prior information on the PEs. &#13;
&#13;
The Hierarchical Bayesian Estimator facilitated by suitable prior information solved the problem of heterogeneity in the dynamic panel data model. Therefore, will find useful applications in panel data economic models.
</summary>
<dc:date>2019-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
