<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>DEVELOPMENT OF ROBUST DISTRIBUTED LAG MODELS WITH  EXPONENTIATED GENERALISED NORMAL ERROR TERM</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/989" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/989</id>
<updated>2026-04-05T19:22:19Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-05T19:22:19Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>DEVELOPMENT OF ROBUST DISTRIBUTED LAG MODELS WITH  EXPONENTIATED GENERALISED NORMAL ERROR TERM</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/990" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>OLUFOLABO, Oluyomi Olusesan</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/990</id>
<updated>2022-02-11T13:49:08Z</updated>
<published>2019-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">DEVELOPMENT OF ROBUST DISTRIBUTED LAG MODELS WITH  EXPONENTIATED GENERALISED NORMAL ERROR TERM
OLUFOLABO, Oluyomi Olusesan
Distributed Lag Model (DLM) is a major workhorse in dynamic single-equation regression, which &#13;
requires stringent assumptions for its validity. One of the critical assumptions of DLM is the &#13;
normality of the Error Term (ET) which is often violated in practice and often leads to spurious &#13;
inference and poor forecast performance. Violations of other assumptions had been considered in &#13;
previous studies but not the Exponentiated Generalised Normal ET (EGNET) of the DLM. &#13;
Therefore, this study was designed to develop a Robust DLM (RDLM) that could enhance &#13;
inference when the assumption of normality of ET is violated.&#13;
Exponentiated Generalised Normal Distribution (EGND) was examined by convoluting the &#13;
exponentiated link function; ( ) = [ ( )] ( ), where &gt; 0 is the shape parameter, ( ) and ( ) are the &#13;
probability density and distribution functions respectively with the generalised&#13;
normal distribution : ( ) =where σ and&#13;
are the standard&#13;
√&#13;
deviation and mean of the distribution, respectively. The DLM was then used in EGND to obtain &#13;
the density function of the RDLM. The maximum likelihood method was used to estimate the &#13;
parameters and the statistical properties of RDLM. The proposed model was validated with life &#13;
and simulated data. Monthly data on Nigeria’s gross domestic product and external reserve from &#13;
1981 to 2015 extracted from the Central Bank of Nigeria statistical bulletin were used, while data &#13;
of sample sizes 20, 50, 200, 500, 1000, 5000 and 10,000 were simulated and replicated 10,000 &#13;
times. For each of the simulated data, outliers were injected randomly to obtain non-normally &#13;
distributed data. The performance of the proposed model was compared with DLM model with &#13;
normal ET using Akaike Information Criteria (AIC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean &#13;
Absolute Error (MAE). The lower the value of the performance criteria the better the model.&#13;
The developed probability density function of RDLM was:&#13;
( ) = , where is the observed data&#13;
iii&#13;
of the response variable at time t , is the intercept, βi, ( = 1, … , ) and , = 1, 2, … , are the response &#13;
rates at the lags of both explanatory and response variables , respectively. The derived properties &#13;
of the proposed model confirmed that EGND was a valid distribution. The simulated data of sizes &#13;
20, 50, 200, 500, 1000, 5000 and 10,000 showed AIC of 67.18, 151.58, 568.22, 1419.89, 2876. &#13;
86, 14156.15, 28220.94, respectively for DLM with normal ET. For DLM with EGNET, the AIC &#13;
values were -40.01, -116.66, -282.19, -655.10, -1533.01, -3007.01, 5606.92, -26960.82, and -&#13;
5283.44, respectively. For life data, DLM with EGNET performed better than DLM with normal &#13;
ET as indicated by AIC values of 1590.08 and1695.19, respectively. Forecast performance &#13;
indicated that RDLM was better than DLM for forecasting with lower RMSE and MAE values of &#13;
1730.50, 18348.71 and 4325.37, 30839.37, respectively.&#13;
The distributed lag model with exponentiated generalised normal error term showed improved &#13;
forecasting and inference even when the residual term were not normally distributed. It is therefore &#13;
recommended for normally distributed and skewed data sets.
</summary>
<dc:date>2019-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
