<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1769">
<title>NIGERIA’S NATIONAL DEFENCE POLICY AND THE  MANAGEMENT OF ASYMMETRIC CONFLICT, 2007 – 2017</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1769</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1770"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T17:28:51Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1770">
<title>NIGERIA’S NATIONAL DEFENCE POLICY AND THE  MANAGEMENT OF ASYMMETRIC CONFLICT, 2007 – 2017</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1770</link>
<description>NIGERIA’S NATIONAL DEFENCE POLICY AND THE  MANAGEMENT OF ASYMMETRIC CONFLICT, 2007 – 2017
AROGBOFA, Jones Oladehinde
Globally, governments evolve their National Defence Policies in order to address &#13;
conventional security challenges. Countries such as the USA, the UK, France, India, &#13;
and Kenya have had the need to modify their policies to address contemporary &#13;
asymmetric security challenges such as terrorism, insurgency, guerrilla warfare and &#13;
militancy. Although several academic works have been carried out on Nigeria’s &#13;
security challenges and its management, none has given adequate consideration to the &#13;
National Defence Policy (NDP) in the management of asymmetric conflict. This study &#13;
was therefore, designed to interrogate Nigeria’s NDP, the extent to which the policy &#13;
addresses asymmetric conflict, and the challenges of operationalising it. &#13;
The Raymond Aaron’s Peace and War Theory was used as the framework, while an &#13;
exploratory design was employed. Both primary and secondary sources of data were &#13;
collected. Six key informant interviews were conducted with two academics who are &#13;
versed in defence policy, two top military officers who were theatre commanders, one &#13;
of the drafters of the NDP and a defence policy analyst. Four focus group discussions &#13;
were held with senior military officers in the office of the Chief of Defence Staff and &#13;
the National Defence College, Abuja. In-depth interviews were also conducted with &#13;
community leaders in the North-East and the Niger Delta regions where the NDP was &#13;
applied. Secondary data, including journals, newsletters were obtained from official &#13;
defence sources. Data were content-analysed.&#13;
Nigeria evolved its NDP in 2006, which was framed largely to deal with conventional &#13;
conflict. This was however modified in 2015 and 2017 in response to the fledging &#13;
asymmetric conflict and it contained strategies for dealing with the Boko Haram &#13;
terrorism (insurgency) in the North-East and militancy in the Niger Delta. However, &#13;
the application of these strategies remained complex and challenging because it lacked &#13;
a standard operation procedure. The major implementers noted the lack of political &#13;
will on the part of successive governments to implement the NDP, a lack of &#13;
cooperation by military high commands and poor synergistic operations among &#13;
security agencies, especially military field commanders as some of the major &#13;
challenges. In-depth interviews revealed that challenges at the operational level &#13;
included inadequate knowledge on the part of battlefield commanders. about the &#13;
contents of the defence policies and excessive domination of the Ministry of Defence, &#13;
which ought to be highly professionalised, by civilian directors who had limited &#13;
knowledge of defence strategies and operations. Besides, the military was also poorly &#13;
funded, ill-equipped and rarely supported by community members in the theatres of &#13;
operation due to poor civil-military relations and trust deficit.&#13;
Nigeria’s National Defence Policy has not been well implemented from 2007 to 2017 &#13;
to adequately curtail the challenges of asymmetric conflict due to logistic capital &#13;
deficit. Therefore, stakeholders should address these challenges to ensure its effective &#13;
implementation.
</description>
<dc:date>2021-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
