<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1984">
<title>EVALUATION OF THE LITERACY PROGRAMME OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR MASS LITERACY, ADULT AND NON-FORMAL EDUCATION IN NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1984</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1985"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-04T12:12:20Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1985">
<title>EVALUATION OF THE LITERACY PROGRAMME OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR MASS LITERACY, ADULT AND NON-FORMAL EDUCATION IN NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1985</link>
<description>EVALUATION OF THE LITERACY PROGRAMME OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR MASS LITERACY, ADULT AND NON-FORMAL EDUCATION IN NIGERIA
EDEH, John Onimisi
The National Commission for Mass Literacy, Adult and Non-Formal Education (NMEC) under&#13;
the supervision of the Federal Ministry of Education implemented the Revitalisation of Adult&#13;
and Youth Literacy Programme in March 2011 with the intention of increasing the nation’s&#13;
literacy rate as a complementary pathway to realising the goals of quality education and lifelong&#13;
learning for over 65 million young persons and adults who have missed out on the formal&#13;
system. However, available documentary reports have been self-reporting, without much&#13;
empirical evidence. This study therefore, was designed to evaluate the implementation of the&#13;
NMEC literacy programme, with a view to ascertaining the extent to which the programme&#13;
impacted on the attainment of the National literacy goal.&#13;
The Context Input Process Product Model guided the study, while the descriptive survey design&#13;
was adopted. The six Local Government Areas (LGAs) (Ibarapa North in Oyo State, Odeda in&#13;
Ogun State, Dukku in Gombe State, Yankwashi in Jigawa State, Bende in Abia State, and&#13;
Ughelli North in Delta State) where NMEC’s revitalisation programme was held were&#13;
purposively selected. Stratified random sampling was used to select 270 literacy facilitators and&#13;
220 literacy beneficiaries across the six LGAs. Ninety-six officials of NMEC zonal offices and&#13;
states agencies and 30 personnel of International development partners were enumerated.&#13;
Instruments used were NMEC Literacy Impact Assessment Questionnaire (r=0.88) and NMEC&#13;
Institutional Assessment Scale (r=0.79). These were complemented with six sessions of Focus&#13;
Group Discussion and seven sessions of Key Informant Interviews with literacy beneficiaries, as&#13;
well as NMEC’s Executive Secretary and state agencies directors respectively. Data were&#13;
analysed using content analysis, descriptive statistics and Pearson product moment correlation at&#13;
0.05 level of significance.&#13;
The beneficiaries of the NMEC programme were: adult non-literates (peasant farmers, market&#13;
women, nomads/migrants, and low-skilled workers) (53.0%), out-of-school street children and&#13;
youths (38.0%) and Quranic school children (9.0%). Basic literacy (58.0%) was the most&#13;
dominant and covered programme of the commission, followed by post-literacy (31.0%) and&#13;
vocational education (11.0%). The objectives (78.0%) and contents (76.0%) of the programme&#13;
were highly rated. With the exception of financial commitment (5.0%), the mobilisation of&#13;
resources: human (71.0%) and instructional materials (76.0%) were commended; while the&#13;
programme’s publicity (48.0%) was rated slightly below average. NMEC’s literacy programme&#13;
had positive significant relationships with the inauguration of state agencies promoting literacy&#13;
activities (r=0.70), networking with development partners (r=0.46), establishment and&#13;
monitoring of literacy centres (r=0.39), provision of instructional materials (r=0.26), advocacy&#13;
(r=0.24) and facilitators’ recruitment (r=0.21). Inadequate funding, difficulty in accessing&#13;
counterpart funding from Universal Basic Education Commission, recruitment of nonprofessional facilitators, and delayed payment/under-payment of facilitators by state agencies&#13;
were the major challenges to NMEC’s literacy programme.&#13;
Regardless of its financial constraints, the literacy programme of the National Commission for&#13;
Mass Literacy, Adult and Non-Formal Education impacted positively on the attainment of the&#13;
national literacy goal. However, increase in funding, prompt payment of facilitators andxiv&#13;
recruitment of professional facilitators would improve the Commission’s capacity to implement&#13;
the Education-for-All literacy goal in Nigeria.
</description>
<dc:date>2018-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
