<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2285">
<title>COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICIES, INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT, TECHNOLOGY USE AND INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE PRESERVATION AMONG CUSTODIANS OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN SOUTHERN NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2285</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2286"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-18T09:39:09Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2286">
<title>COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICIES, INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT, TECHNOLOGY USE AND INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE PRESERVATION AMONG CUSTODIANS OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN SOUTHERN NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2286</link>
<description>COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICIES, INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT, TECHNOLOGY USE AND INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE PRESERVATION AMONG CUSTODIANS OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN SOUTHERN NIGERIA
OYELUDE, Adetoun Adebisi
Indigenous Knowledge Preservation (IKP) ensures that documents at-risk are kept in good&#13;
condition for posterity in Cultural Heritage Institutions (CHIs) such as libraries, archives and&#13;
museums. Reports, however, indicate that IKP in CHIs were ineffective. Studies have addressed&#13;
IKP from procedural, cultural and social perspectives, without adequate attention to the policies,&#13;
institutional environment and technology use for IKP, especially across different CHIs in Nigeria.&#13;
This study, therefore, investigated collection development policies, institutional environment,&#13;
technology use and IKP in CHIs in southern Nigeria.&#13;
The Socio-technical and Cultural Historical Activity theories provided the framework, while the&#13;
survey design of the correlational type was adopted. A two-stage sampling procedure was adopted&#13;
to choose CHIs, specifically special libraries, federal university libraries, the National Library of&#13;
Nigeria, the National Archives, and the National Museum branches across southern Nigeria&#13;
(South-west, South-south and South-east). The CHIs in two states each were selected through&#13;
balloting, thus, all 27 libraries, six archives and nine museums, made up of 289 librarians, 29&#13;
archivists and 36 museum curators were enumerated. The instruments used were Institutional&#13;
Environment (r=0.94) and Technology Use for Preservation (r=0.93) scales, and observation&#13;
checklist. Key informant interviews were conducted each with 18 Heads of libraries, three&#13;
archivists and nine museum curators from the 42 institutions. Quantitative data were analysed&#13;
using descriptive statistics, Pearson product moment correlation and Multiple regression at 0.05&#13;
level of significance, while qualitative data were content-analysed.&#13;
The respondents’ age was 42.7±8.75, while years of work experience spanned 1-10 years (53.7%),&#13;
11-20 years (27.6%), 21-30 years (11.3%), and 31-40 years (7.4%). The regulatory (X ̅= 2.91),&#13;
organisational (&#119883;̅ = 2.80), sociological &#119883;̅ =2.65) and physical environment (&#119883;̅ =2.75) for the&#13;
preservation of IK resources in CHIs was favourable as against the threshold of 2.50. There were&#13;
positive significant relationships between collection development policies (r=.51), institutional&#13;
environment (r=.58) and technology use (r=.75) and IKP. There were positive significant&#13;
relationships between collection development policies and institutional environment (r=.45), and&#13;
technology use (r=.43) and IKP. The collection development policies and institutional&#13;
environment jointly predicted IKP (F(2;325) =112.96; Adj R2=0.41), accounting for 41.0% of its&#13;
variance. The collection development policies did not have guidelines for IKP in written,&#13;
electronic or other formats in the CHIs. Periodic evaluation of policies was inadequate, the&#13;
environment was not conducive for electronic preservation, and staff were not sufficiently trained.&#13;
In addition, there was inadequate funding, poor infrastructure, and shortage of preservation staff.&#13;
Collection development policies, institutional environment and technology use influenced&#13;
indigenous knowledge preservation among custodians of cultural heritage in southern Nigeria.&#13;
There should be proper documentation of collection development policies for indigenous&#13;
knowledge preservation, while technology use and institutional environment should be monitored.&#13;
More creative and sustainable sources of funding should be vigorously pursued by different&#13;
stakeholders.
</description>
<dc:date>2023-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
