<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>CARBONiSTOCKSANDiSEQUESTRATIONiPOTENTIALiOFiIBODIiMONKEY iFORESTiIBODI, iATAKUMOSAiWESTiLOCALiGOVERNMENTiAREAiOFiOSUN iSTATE, iNIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1282</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:20:25 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T17:20:25Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>CARBONiSTOCKSANDiSEQUESTRATIONiPOTENTIALiOFiIBODIiMONKEY iFORESTiIBODI, iATAKUMOSAiWESTiLOCALiGOVERNMENTiAREAiOFiOSUN iSTATE, iNIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1283</link>
<description>CARBONiSTOCKSANDiSEQUESTRATIONiPOTENTIALiOFiIBODIiMONKEY iFORESTiIBODI, iATAKUMOSAiWESTiLOCALiGOVERNMENTiAREAiOFiOSUN iSTATE, iNIGERIA
KOMOLAFE, EMMANUEL TIMILEHIN
Ibodi iMonkey iForest i(IMF) iis iknown ifor iits iillegal imining iactivities, iwhich ihave iled ito ithe&#13;
idegradationiofitheiforestiecosystem. iMostistudiesionitheiforestifocusedionifloristiciandimonkey&#13;
ispeciesidiversity. iThe iCarbon iStock i(CS) iand iSequestration iPotential i(SP), iwhich iare icritical&#13;
ifor imitigating iCO2 iemissions iof iIMF, ihave inot ibeen ifully iquantified. iThis istudy itherefore&#13;
iinvestigated ithe idistribution ipattern iof iCarbon ipools iand iSequestration ipotential iin idifferent&#13;
iphysiognomiesiinitheiforest.&#13;
Four iplots iof i25 im i× i25 im ieach iwere irandomly iselected iin ithree iphysiognomies: iRegrowth&#13;
iForest i(RF), iCocoa iPlantation i(CP)iand iTree iFallow i(TF). iIn ieach iphysiognomy, iall istanding&#13;
itreesiwith iDiameteriat iBreast iHeight i≥10cmiwere iidentified, imeasured iand ienumerated. iMean&#13;
iBasal iArea i(MBA) iof ithe iplants iwas idetermined iusing istandard iformulae. iThe ibiodiversity&#13;
iindices iderived iincluded iShannon-Wiener iDiversity iIndex i(SWDI), iSorenson’s iSimilarity&#13;
iIndexi(SSI)iandiFamilyiImportanceiValueiIndexi(FIVI). iTheitemporalichangesiinitheistudyisite&#13;
iwere idetermined iby icomparing iresultsiwith ibaseline idata. iA idiagonal itransect iwasilaid iwithin&#13;
ieach iplot ifor isoil isample icollection iat ifour isoil idepths i(0-15, i16-30, i31-45, iand i46-60 icm).&#13;
iBiomassiandiCSiinidifferenticarbonipools, inamelyiSoiliOrganiciCarboni(SOC), iAboveiGround&#13;
iCarbon i(AGC), iBelow iGround iCarbon i(BGC), iHerb-Litter-Saplings i(HLS) iwere icalculated&#13;
iusing istandard imethods. iCarbon iSequestration iPotential i(CSP) iwas idetermined ifrom ithe isoil&#13;
iand iplant ilitter ianalyses ias iwell ias iallometric iequations iusing istandard iformulae. iData iwere&#13;
ianalysediusingidescriptiveistatisticsiandiANOVAi(α0.05).&#13;
Eighty-seven, ieighty-sixiandioneihundrediandisixiplantispeciesiwereiencounterediinitheiRF, iCP&#13;
iand iTF, irespectively. iThe iestimated iMBAi(m2ha-1&#13;
)iwere i17.96, i13.12iandi1.93 iforiRF, iCPiand&#13;
iTF, irespectively. iTheiSWDIiinitheithreeiphysiognomiesiwasi3.02, i0.39iandi0.29iforiRF, iCPiand&#13;
iTF, irespectively. iTheiSSIiiniallitheiphysiognomiesistudiedishowedilowisimilaritiesiwithiCPiand&#13;
iTF ibeing ithe imost isimilar i(48.9%), iwhile iRF iand iCP iwere imost idissimilar i(35.1%). iFamily&#13;
iSterculiaceae i(60.65)ihaditheihighestiandiPolygalaceae i(1.43)ihadithe ilowestiFIVI. iThere iwere&#13;
isignificant idifferences iin ithe inumber iof ispecies iwhen icompared ito ibaseline idata. iTotal iSOC&#13;
i(tha-1&#13;
) iin ithe ithree iphysiognomiesiwasi333.11, iwith i144.34 i(RF), i94.37 i(CP) iand i94.40 i(TF).&#13;
iTotal iAGCi(tCha-1&#13;
) istock iwasi5492.93, ithe itrend iwasi3529.29 i(RF)i&gt; i1477.12 i(CP)i&gt; i486.52&#13;
i(TF). iTotal iBGC i(tCha-1&#13;
) istock iwasi823.94, iin ithe iorder i529.39 i(RF) i&gt; i221.57 i(CP) i&gt; i72.98&#13;
i(TF). iTotal iHLS iCS i(tCha-1&#13;
) iwasi0.15 iwith ithe itrend i0.09 i(RF) i&gt; i0.04 i(CP)&gt; i0.02 i(TF). iThe&#13;
itotal iCSP i(tCO2eha-1&#13;
) iin iIMF iwasi24386.02. iThe ipool itrend iwasi20142.57 i(AGC) i&gt; i3021.39&#13;
iii&#13;
i(BGC)i&gt;i1221.51i(SOC)i&gt;i0.55i(HLS). iThereiwereisignificantlyihigheriCSiandiSPivaluesiiniRF&#13;
icompared ito iCP iand iTP iacross idifferent iCarbon ipools idue ito ithe ipresence iof imore iwoody&#13;
ispeciesiinitheiphysiognomy.&#13;
Ibodi iMonkey iForest ihas ian iappreciable icarbon istorage ipotential, iwith ithe iregrowth iforest&#13;
ibeing ibest iin icarbon istorage. iIncreased ianthropogenic iactivities iat ithe ifringes iof ithe iforest&#13;
ishouldihoweveribeicontrolled. i
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1283</guid>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
