<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF A SALTED PORK PRODUCT, UNAM INUNG,  IN CALABAR, NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1725</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 19:11:33 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-04T19:11:33Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF A SALTED PORK PRODUCT, UNAM INUNG,  IN CALABAR, NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1726</link>
<description>QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF A SALTED PORK PRODUCT, UNAM INUNG,  IN CALABAR, NIGERIA
AKPAN, Idongesit Philip
Unam inung (Ui), a popular salted pork product produced and consumed locally in &#13;
Calabar metropolis has dwindled in popularity due to the non-availability of standard &#13;
recipe leading to high variation in its quality. A standard recipe for Ui could boost its &#13;
production and also make it a popular commercial meat product. However, a &#13;
standardised salt inclusion level and technique for Ui production is yet to be &#13;
adequately documented. Hence, quality attributes of Ui prepared using varying table &#13;
salt concentrations, pork cuts and processing methods were assessed.&#13;
Samples of Commercial Ui (CUi) from three processors (P1, P2, P3) were assessed for &#13;
their proximate composition and Total Bacteria Count (TBC, log cfu/g) using standard &#13;
procedures. Freshly harvested pork bellies were sectioned into five slabs 129.54 x &#13;
216.2 x 26.9mm dimension each weighing 500g. Each slab was dry-rubbed with 0, 5, &#13;
10, 15 and 20 % Table Salt (TS) w/w in a completely randomised design in triplicate. &#13;
The slabs were stacked, sundried and reshuffled at two-day intervals for eight days. &#13;
Weight Loss (WL, g), TBC, Lipid Oxidation (LO, mg/kg), and the proximate &#13;
compositions were determined following standard procedures. Pork from belly, ham, &#13;
shoulder, and loin of similar dimensions were sectioned into slabs and dry rubbed with &#13;
15% TS. The pork cuts were kept raw, smoked or sun-dried in a 3x4 factorial &#13;
arrangement in a completely randomised design. Proximate composition and TBC &#13;
were determined. Data were subjected to descriptive statistics, regression and ANOVA &#13;
at α0.05.&#13;
The CUi had similar crude protein content while, the ash (%) in P2 (6.5±1.0) and P3 &#13;
(6.8±1.0) were significantly higher than in P1 (4.0±1.0). The ether extracts of &#13;
21.6±1.0% (P1) and 20.0±1.0% (P3) were similar but higher than 17.3±1.3% (P2). The &#13;
TBC of 3.36 ±0.02 (P2) was higher than 3.17±0.20 (P3) and 3.07±0.11(P1). The WL &#13;
reduced progressively with increased addition of TS from 32.5±6.0 (5%), 24.5±3.3 &#13;
(10%), 21.3±1.0 (15%) to 17.1±0.6 (20%). Significantly lower TBC of 3.2±0.2 was in &#13;
Ui rubbed with 15% TS than 8.1±0.1 (0%), 5.5±0.1 (5%), 3.5±0.2 (10%) and 3.5±0.1 &#13;
(20%). The relationship between TS inclusion levels in Ui and TBC (R2=0.99) was &#13;
significant. The LO of 0.616±0.01 (10%) and 0.634±0.012 (15%) were similar but &#13;
higher than 0.174±0.012 (0%), 0.195±0.008 (5%) and 0.484±0.013 (20%). Ash (%) &#13;
content of 25.4±1.9 and 27.2±0.1 in 15% and 20% TS slabs were higher than 18.7±2.5 &#13;
and 9.2±1.1 in 10% and 5% TS slabs, respectively. Ether extracts of 25.3±3.1 (5%) &#13;
and 23.8±4.3 (20%) were significantly higher than 17.8±2.7 (10%) while 21.25±1.0&#13;
(15%) was similar to 5, 10 and 20% treatments. The CP of 29.08±2.85 (5%) was &#13;
significantly higher than 19.88±1.73 (10%), 23.32±2.50 (15%), and 23.46±4.06 (20%). &#13;
Effects of interaction of processing methods and meat cuts on proximate composition &#13;
of Ui were significant. The TBC of 3.2± 0.1 in raw meat cut was significantly higher &#13;
than 3.06±0.01 (sundried) and 3.09±0.05 (smoked) meat samples.&#13;
Dry-rubbing pork with 15% w/w table salt lowered total microbial load while smoking &#13;
and sun-drying enhanced the shelf life.
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1726</guid>
<dc:date>2021-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
