<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>BOUNDARY CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES BETWEEN ADADAMA COMMUNITY IN CROSS RIVER STATE AND AMAGU COMMUNITY IN EBONYI STATE, NIGERIA, 1996-2018</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1783</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 16:12:19 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T16:12:19Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>BOUNDARY CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES BETWEEN ADADAMA COMMUNITY IN CROSS RIVER STATE AND AMAGU COMMUNITY IN EBONYI STATE, NIGERIA, 1996-2018</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1784</link>
<description>BOUNDARY CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES BETWEEN ADADAMA COMMUNITY IN CROSS RIVER STATE AND AMAGU COMMUNITY IN EBONYI STATE, NIGERIA, 1996-2018
UWAKWE, Stanley Ikechukwu
Thelcreationloflstateslandladministrativelsub-unitslaimedlatlfurtherldevelopinglrurallareaslin&#13;
Nigeria lhas lgenerated lchallenges lincluding lethnic, lreligious, lintra land linter-state lboundary&#13;
conflicts lover lland lownership land lusage, lmineral lresource lroyalties land lgrazing lrights&#13;
lbetween lcontiguous lcommunities. lThese lconflicts lhave lresulted lin lloss lof llives, ldestruction&#13;
lof lproperty land linternal ldisplacements. lStudies lon lNigeria’s linternal lboundaries lhave&#13;
lexaminedltheirlorigins,ldynamicslandltheirlpoliticisation.lHowever,lstudieslonlstrategieslfor&#13;
lboundary lconflicts lmanagement lis lscanty. lTherefore, lthis lstudy linvestigates lconflict&#13;
lmanagement lstrategies lemployed land ltheir lchallenges lin lAdadama land lAmagu&#13;
lcommunities.l&#13;
Vasquez’slTerritoriallandlKieh’slPrimordiallConflictltheorieslservedlaslthelframework,lwhile&#13;
lthe lcase lstudy ldesign lwas ladopted. lPrimary land lsecondary ldata lwere lutilised. lPrimary ldata&#13;
lwere lsourced lfrom lkey linformant linterviews lconducted lwith l27 lpurposively lselected&#13;
lindividuals land lstakeholder lgroups, lincluding lCommunity lleaders l(4), lWomen lleaders l(4),&#13;
lYouthlleadersl(4),lSecuritylagentsl(2),lNational lBoundarylCommissionl(NBC)lofficialsl(3),&#13;
lOffice lof lthe lSurveyor-General lof lthe lFederation l(2), lInstitute lfor lPeace land lConflict&#13;
lResolution, lAbuja l(1), lCross lRiver lstate lgovernment l(1), lEbonyi lstate lgovernment lofficials&#13;
l(2), lacademia l(2) land llegal lpractitioners l(2). lOne lfocus lgroup ldiscussion lwas lalso lheld lin&#13;
leachlofltheltwolcommunities,lwhilelsecondaryldatalwerelsourcedlfromlrelevantlpublications.&#13;
lDatalwerelcontent-analysed.l&#13;
Boundary lconflicts lbetween lthe ltwo lcommunities lwere lcaused lby lpoor ldemarcation lof lthe&#13;
lboundary lby lthe lNBC, lland lencroachments, lclimate lchange-induced lflooding, lland&#13;
ldegradation land lpopulation lincrease. lThe lconsequences lof lthe lconflict lincluded: lthe lloss lof&#13;
l62 llives lin lAdadama lcommunity land lclaim lby lAmagu lcommunity lof lloss lof lover lone&#13;
lthousand llives, ldestruction lof lproperty, linternal ldisplacement lof lpersons, lretardation lof&#13;
ldevelopment land lbreakdown lof linter-group lrelations. lThe lconflict lmanagement lstrategies&#13;
lemployed lwere linstitutional land lindigenous. lThe linstitutional lstrategies lincluded&#13;
ladministrative lMechanism lof ldemarcation lsuch las ljoint lmeeting lof lofficials lon lCross lRiver&#13;
land lEbonyi linter-state lboundary lcommittee lset lup lby lNBC lto lidentify land lpropose lan&#13;
lacceptable lborderline; linter-state land linter llocal lgovernment lpeace lcommittees lestablished&#13;
ljointly lby lCross lRiver land lEbonyi lgovernments lto lfacilitate ldialogue land lpeaceful&#13;
lcoexistence lbetween lthe ltwo lcommunities. lThe lindigenous lmechanism ldeveloped land&#13;
lutilisedlbylAdadamalandlAmagulcommunitieslinvolvedlpaymentlofllevieslbylthelcommunity&#13;
lof lan laggressor, ljoint loffering lof lsacrifices, lcultural land ltraditional lrites. lThe lindigenous&#13;
lmechanisms lcomplimented lthe linstitutional lmechanisms lin lengendering lpeace land lstability&#13;
lin lthe ltwo lcommunities. lHowever, lunyielding lnumber lof linterested lstakeholders, lrigid&#13;
lpositionlofltheltwolcommunities,llacklofltrustlandlsabotagelamongstlthelcommunities’lruling&#13;
leliteslconstitutedlthelmainlchallengesltoltheleffectivelmanagementloflthelboundarylconflict.&#13;
Boundarylconflicts larelalmajorlsourceloflinsecurity,llossloflliveslandldestructionloflproperty&#13;
linlNigerialaslobservedlinlthelAdadamalandlAmagulcommunities’lfroml1996-2018.lThelstudy&#13;
ltherefore lrecommends lre-demarcation lof lthe lboundary lby lNational lBoundary lCommission&#13;
las lwell las lhybriding lof lindigenous land linstitutional lstrategies lin lboundary lconflicts&#13;
lmanagement.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1784</guid>
<dc:date>2021-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
