<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>TRENDS, CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF KIDNAPPING IN OVOM AMA-ASAA, ABIA STATE, NIGERIA, 2010-2016</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1785</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 16:12:21 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T16:12:21Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>TRENDS, CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF KIDNAPPING IN OVOM AMA-ASAA, ABIA STATE, NIGERIA, 2010-2016</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1786</link>
<description>TRENDS, CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF KIDNAPPING IN OVOM AMA-ASAA, ABIA STATE, NIGERIA, 2010-2016
OKOLIE-OSEMENE, James
Kidnapping is a major security threat, generating concern in urban and rural areas in&#13;
Nigeria. Previous research focused on kidnapping in the context of petro-economy and&#13;
militancy, with more emphasis on incidents in urban areas than rural communities.&#13;
Therefore, this study examined the trends, causes, patterns and consequences of&#13;
kidnapping in Ovom Ama-asaa, Abia State, Nigeria.&#13;
Brantingham and Brantingham’s Crime Pattern, Cohen and Felson’s Routine Activity,&#13;
and Hirschi’s Social Control provided the framework. The case study and the&#13;
exploratory designs were adopted. Primary and secondary sources of data were&#13;
utilised. The primary data comprised ethnography, three focus group discussion&#13;
sessions with elders, women and youths, 20 in-depth interviews conducted with 14&#13;
elders, a woman leader, four clergymen, and one officer of the Nigeria Security and&#13;
Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC). Also, 10 key informant interviews were held with&#13;
seven chiefs, a king and two repentant kidnappers. The secondary data were sourced&#13;
from relevant publications. Data were subjected to content and trend analyses.&#13;
There was an increase in the incidence of kidnapping between 2010 and 2012, while&#13;
the incidents decreased between 2013 and 2016, owing to foot patrols by vigilantes.&#13;
The collapse of traditional values, inadequate investment in youth-centred human&#13;
development, neglect of human security, gaps in functional leadership and weak social&#13;
control accounted for the incidents of kidnapping. Kidnapping was not focused on&#13;
highly attractive targets alone but the preventive ransom was also collected from&#13;
elders, businessmen and prominent community members who were outspoken against&#13;
the act of kidnapping. People were kidnapped at homes, farms, shops, churches, during&#13;
ceremonies and isolated places. The kidnappers tortured those in captivity and still&#13;
received ransoms after the unlucky victims lost their lives. Many people hid in nearby&#13;
bushes around their homes, while some preferred to leave the community to reduce the&#13;
risk of being kidnapped. Kidnapping contributed to the loss of monetary value, sources&#13;
of livelihood and property to the extent that farmers became afraid of going to their&#13;
farms. The measures for controlling kidnapping were both village-based and&#13;
community-focused. Weekly palace council community security review was strategic&#13;
in reducing kidnapping. The community-driven security strategy, an initiative by the&#13;
palace council aimed at discussing community safety matters after receiving reports&#13;
from stakeholders, and sustained by traditional security providers had reduced the&#13;
occurrence of kidnapping.&#13;
Kidnapping in Ovom Ama-asaa, Abia State, Nigeria, from 2010-2016 had poor social&#13;
control measures that motivated the act and undermined human development.&#13;
Stakeholders should implement regularly non-formal peace education to change the&#13;
mindset of the people away from kidnapping acts in the community.
</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1786</guid>
<dc:date>2021-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
