<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>PERFORMANCE OF POST-HARVEST STORAGE BAGS AND DIATOMACEOUS EARTH FOR THE PROTECTION OF STORED MAIZE AGAINST INSECT PEST INFESTATIONS</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2160</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 23:47:50 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-05T23:47:50Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>PERFORMANCE OF POST-HARVEST STORAGE BAGS AND DIATOMACEOUS EARTH FOR THE PROTECTION OF STORED MAIZE AGAINST INSECT PEST INFESTATIONS</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2161</link>
<description>PERFORMANCE OF POST-HARVEST STORAGE BAGS AND DIATOMACEOUS EARTH FOR THE PROTECTION OF STORED MAIZE AGAINST INSECT PEST INFESTATIONS
ASIWAJU-BELLO, Shekinat Kehinde
Maize is an important staple crop widely used in domestic and industrial processes. It is&#13;
usually stored in Polypropylene (PP) bags, where it is prone to heavy insect infestations,&#13;
resulting in high economic losses. A number of recent interventions to prevent insect&#13;
infestations during grain storage include Diatomaceous Earth (DE) and novel bags such&#13;
as ZeroFly (ZF) and Purdue Improved Crop Storage (PICS). However, there is paucity&#13;
of data on their effectiveness and optimal use in insect pest management. Therefore, this&#13;
study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of different storage bags and DE&#13;
against stored-insect pests of maize.&#13;
The study was conducted between February, 2017 and January, 2018 in a storehouse at&#13;
Arisekola Market, Bodija, Ibadan. Pristine 50 kg SWAN 2 maize variety was stored&#13;
using eight different bag treatments comprising: PP (control) and ZF, DE admixed in PP&#13;
and ZF (PPDE and ZFDE), single and double hermetic liners in PP (PP1L and PICS),&#13;
single and double hermetic liners in ZF (ZF1L and ZF2L). A stack of three replicates&#13;
for each treatment was placed on separate pallet and arranged one meter apart. In&#13;
addition, for each ZF1L, ZF2L, PP1L and PICS, two sets comprising 3 replicates/set&#13;
were stored for destructive sampling every four-months using standard procedure. Maize&#13;
in ZF, PP, ZFDE and PPDE were sampled monthly. Insect population count, insect&#13;
damaged kernel, maize weight loss and insect perforation on bags were determined&#13;
through standard procedures. Maize quality was determined through standard seed&#13;
germination method, maize Moisture Content (MC) was measured by MC meter and&#13;
aflatoxin level by Thin-Layer Chromatography. Data were analysed using descriptive&#13;
statistics and ANOVA at α0.05.&#13;
Total insect population of 5,945 in all treatment bags comprised predominantly&#13;
Sitophilus zeamais (2,593), followed by Tribolium castaneum (1,298), Liposcelis spp.&#13;
(1,193) and the least occurring Cryptolestes ferrugineus (861). Percentage of insect&#13;
species per bag: ZF2L (0.2) and ZF1L (0.3) were significantly lower than the population&#13;
in ZFDE (3.2) and PPDE (7.9), but higher in ZF (51.8) and PP (35.4). Insect damaged&#13;
kernel was significantly low in ZF2L (0.4±0.0%), ZF1L (0.5±0.0%) and ZFDE&#13;
(0.8±0.3%) compared to ZF (16.9±1.6%) and PP (5.4±0.9%). The maize weight loss&#13;
was significantly low in ZF2L (0.1±0.0%), PICS (0.2±0.0%) and ZFDE (0.2±0.1%)&#13;
compared to ZF (6.7±0.8%). The number of insect perforations on ZF2L (0.0±0.0), PICS&#13;
(1.3±0.4) and ZF (17.0±3.1) were significantly lower compared with the control, PP&#13;
(51.5±5.7). Seed germination rate (97.5±0.6%) in ZF2L and PICS were significantly&#13;
higher than PP (78.3±0.1%) and ZF (66.0±2.3%). The initial MC of the maize in&#13;
treatment bags was 11.4±0.1%, but the final MC in ZF2L (12.2±0.1%) was significantly&#13;
lower than in PP (13.5±0.1%). Aflatoxin levels in maize in all treatment bags were&#13;
within the recommended limits (4 µg/kg) of Standards Organisation of Nigeria, except&#13;
the PP (5.0 µg/kg).&#13;
Hermetic storage bags and diatomaceous earth were effective at controlling insect&#13;
infestations and preserved stored maize quality. Therefore, they could be used in postharvest storage interventions.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2161</guid>
<dc:date>2023-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
